M5L3: Starvation in India - India and Global Hunger Index
THE CONTEXT:
Recently, the GHI report ranked India at the 103rd position among 119 countries. This stands
in contrast to the 55th rank India scored in the year 2014. This has triggered controversy at political levels on whether
India is improving or not in this sector after a change in govt.
WHAT IS GLOBAL HUNGER INDEX?
The Global
Hunger Index (GHI) is a tool designed by the International
Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) to comprehensively measure and track
hunger at global, regional, and national levels. It is designed to raise
awareness and call attention by the govt. to eliminate it.
|
HOW ARE THE
GHI SCORES CALCULATED?
GHI
scores are calculated based on four indicators:
Undernourishment: the share
of the population whose caloric intake is insufficient.
Child
Wasting:
the share of children under the age of five who have low weight for their height,
reflecting acute undernutrition
Child
Stunting:
the share of children under the age of five who have low height for their age,
reflecting chronic undernutrition
Child
Mortality:
the mortality rate of children under the age of five that reflects a fatal mix of inadequate nutrition
and unhealthy environments
TYPES AND
DIMENSIONS OF HUNGER
Hunger in simple terms is the desire to consume
food. However, it has two dimensions
1.
Overt (or raw) hunger which is the need to fill
the belly every few hours.
2.
Hidden hunger: This means that there is no
demand for food but the requirement for nutrition is still not catered
satisfactorily. This is determined by Body Mass Index.
WHAT IS THE
CALORIE CONSUMPTION PUZZLE IN INDIA?
In almost all the countries, it has been found
that with development in economy, the per capita calorie consumption of its
population also increases proportionally. In case
of the India, the per capita calorie
consumption has declined despite a reduction
in overall poverty.
DOES THE
2018 GHI RANKING REFLECT THE REAL SITUATION?
·
The method to determine the GHI is different in
2014 and the reports that have followed
since 2017.
·
In 2014, India was ranked 55 out of 76 countries.
In 2017, it included 44 more countries in the ranking list and India has been
ranked 100 out of 119 countries.
·
India score 31.4 in 2017 and 31.1 in 2018 which
means that the situation is improving
(GHI should ideally be zero or close to it)
DEVIL in the
DETAILS
The GHI assigns 70.5% weight to children below five (that constitute 11.5% of overall
population) and 29.5% weight to the
population above five (that constitutes 81.5% of the total population)
Therefore, the term “Hunger Index” is highly
skewed towards undernutrition of children rather than representing the status
of hunger in the overall population. Critics call it as child malnutrition
index than Hunger index.
IMPACT OF
MALNUTRITION
a)
Undernutrition in children reduces the nation’s
economic advancement by at least 8% due to the impact on young child mortality,
increasing incidence of sickness, direct productivity losses, poor cognition,
and reduced schooling. This may eventually impact his earning capacity in his
professional life.
b)
Undernutrition in early childhood also
increases the chances of adult-onset
chronic diseases such as diabetes and cardiovascular
diseases. Most of this expenditure in India is out of pocket that can push a
family into a permanent poverty trap.
c)
Malnutrition results into making our youth
asset un-productive and hence, India is unable to escape the middle-income
trap.
d)
In the case
of India, this undernutrition costs $2.5 billion annually, and that the
productivity losses make up almost 3% of GDP.
FACTORS
RESPONSIBLE
Demand-side issues
|
·
Hunger and malnutrition are caused by a large
number of factors, of which availability and access to a balanced diet are
crucial.
·
The consumption basket of the underprivileged
households in India is likely to be cereal-centric and not necessarily
balanced (due to lack of pulses, coarse grains, fruits, vegetables, dairy
products, egg, fish and meat, etc.)
|
Supply-side issues
|
·
The per capita availability of pulses
declined steadily from about 69 g per day in 1961 to 51 g per day in 1971,
and to about 43 g per day in 2013 (Economic Survey 2016).
·
This shows the adverse impact of the agricultural revolution that is biased
towards certain crops and neglects the rest.
|
Governance
|
·
Commonly held belief within the government is
that food insecurity is the primary cause of malnutrition. This notion is
misplaced since stunting and low weight is also due to the interaction between genetics, environment, and sanitation
·
Even the focus of National Food Security Act,
2013 only on food, and not on health and care-related interventions. This
results in the lack of an integrated approach between Ministry of Consumer
Affairs, Food and Public Distribution,
the MoHFW and MoWCD
|
Gender
status and awareness
|
·
The low status of
women in Indian society, their early marriage, low weight at pregnancy and
illiteracy lead to the low weight of newborn
babies. This is compounded by unscientific breastfeeding practices.
·
In the 100 districts studied in the Hunger
and Malnutrition (HUNGaMA 2011) report, 51% mothers did not give colostrum to
the newborn soon after birth and 58% mothers fed water to their infants
before six months.
|
Poor
Sanitation
|
·
Due to the bad
quality of water and lack of toilets children are exposed to stomach
infections, develop diarrhea and start losing weight.
·
At that time, it is unlikely that he/she will
be able to ingest much good and healthy food and absorb the nutrition
|
Lack of
targeted approach
|
·
The current National Sample Survey Office
(NSSO) data on Household Consumption Expenditure is based on calorie norm
than nutrition norms.
·
Additionally, since health is a part of the state list, the existing quality of data
captured by the health system across states through (censuses and household
surveys) is not sufficient and lacks any standardized format
|
Reach of
Healthcare services
|
·
Due to lack of infra, many services like
vaccination or primary emergency services in healthcare are unable to reach
to the interiors of India.
·
Additionally, many of these areas are also
affected by violence and insurgency.
|
Flawed
approach
|
·
The ICDS targets children mostly after the
age of three when malnutrition has already set in. It places more priority on
food supplementation rather than on nutrition and health education interventions.
·
It has been found at multiple points that due
to lack of accountability, it is poorly delivered, and the staff fudges the
reported data so as to avoid responsibility for high malnutrition
|
Unresponsive
bureaucracy
|
·
The government is found to carry its
responsibility without in-depth analysis of grassroots scenarios. They appear
to take a minimalist view of their responsibility by and reducing it simply
to tendering and contracts for ‘take-home rations’ or ‘ready to use food’
without consultation with medical professionals.
·
While the effectiveness of RUTF is not proved
completely, such practices may also lead to grand corruption at the
Ministerial level that will lead to diversion of essential funds reserved for
this sector.
·
A better option is hot freshly cooked mid-day
meals wherein the local community is engaged. The success of ‘Tithi Bhojan’
in Gujarat is a point in this case.
|
Minimalist
approach
|
·
When the new Ministry of Women and Child
Development was set up, it was expected that it would take a holistic view of
the problems that impinge children’s welfare.
·
This includes education, sanitation, health,
environment etc. that overlap with other ministries
·
However, in this case, it has been found that it has restricted itself to specific
programs like ICDS and MDM while neglecting the other factors that are likely
to impact children’ growth and development.
|
Lessons from
international experiences
·
Child malnutrition rates around 1980 in
Thailand were similar to what we had in India in 1992. However, they could
reduce this from 50 to 25% by 1988.
·
This was achieved through a mix of
interventions including intensive growth monitoring
·
and nutrition education, strong supplementary
feeding provision, high rates of coverage ensured by having high human resource
intensity, iron and vitamin supplementation and salt iodization along with
primary health care.
·
The programme used community volunteers (with
no honorarium) on a huge scale (one per 20 children), and involved local
people, so as to instill self-reliance and communicate effectively with target
groups.
·
Communities were involved in needs assessment,
planning, programme implementation, beneficiary selection and seeking local
financial contributions.
·
Inter-village competition in reducing the
number of under-nourished children was encouraged, and villages were rewarded
for their success.
WHAT SHOULD
BE DONE?
Direct Policy Measures
·
Expand the safety net through
ICDS to cover all vulnerable groups and empower mothers and expectant women)
·
Fortify essential foods with
appropriate nutrients (eg., salt with iodine and/or iron)
·
Popularise low-cost nutritious food
·
Control micro-nutrient
deficiencies amongst vulnerable groups
Indirect Policy Measures
·
Ensure food security through
increased production of food grains
·
Improve dietary pattern by
promoting production and increasing per capita availability of
·
nutritionally rich food
·
Effecting income transfers
(improve the purchasing power of
landless, rural and urban poor; expand and improve public distribution system)
·
Other: Implement land reforms
(tenure, ceiling laws) to reduce the vulnerability
of poor; increase health and immunization
facilities, and nutrition knowledge; prevent food adulteration; monitor
nutrition programmes and strengthen nutrition surveillance; community
participation
Integrated
approach at the ministerial level
·
Currently, all the factors
that impact child’ overall development are divided among various ministries.
(explained in next image). An integrated approach is required to address the
same.
·
Additionally, since
health is a part of the state list, the
union government should work hand in hand with the state government to improve
accountability. With improved finances to the state under the 14th
Finance Commission, this can be executed in a far
better way. till 2035.
·
This issue should be
addressed at war footing if India wants to seize this opportunity and become a part
of high middle income or list of developed countries.
sir , as per wiki :
ReplyDeleteIn 2018, IFPRI stepped aside from its involvement in the project and the GHI became a joint project of Welthungerhilfe and Concern Worldwide